Front-loaded costs
The term ‘front-loaded’ refers to costs that are applied disproportionately to elements of the work that take place early on during a project or part of a project.
Suppliers may front-load costs (or prices in bids) in order to maximise their revenue early in a project by assigning overstated values to the preliminary elements of the work. For example, a contractor might front-load costs for preliminary construction work such as services diversions, demolition, setting out, groundworks, piling, and so on.
Front-loading costs can help reduce a supplier's risk on a project, by improving their cash flow and ensuring that maximum payments are received on projects that might not proceed to completion. However, making payments in excess of the value of work completed puts the client under greater financial pressure early in the project and also at greater risk if the project does not proceed, or if a supplier becomes insolvent or has to be replaced. It can also act as a disincentive for suppliers to keep to time schedules, as they may have already completed the most profitable parts of the works.
Front loading can be avoided by detailed cost planning and cash flow projection during the design development and tender stages of a project, giving the client a clear idea of how much they should be expected to pay at different stages. Tender assessment should then allow comparisons to be made between competing bids to determine whether individual tenderers have submitted excessive prices for certain aspects or stages of the works. During the construction phase, there should be careful assessment of applications for payment to ensure that the amounts paid do not exceed the value of the works completed.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Electrical contractors welcome crackdown on late payment and push for clean energy.
Cyber Security in the Built Environment
Protecting projects, data, and digital assets: A CIOB Academy TIS.
Managing competence in the built environment
ITFG publishes new industry guide on how to meet the ICC principles.
The UK's campaign to reduce noise pollution: Mythbusting, articles and topic guides.
Setting Expectations on Competence Management
Industry Competence Committee.
New Scottish and Welsh governments
CIOB stresses importance of construction after new parliament elections.
The sad story of Derby Hippodrome
An historic building left to decay.
ECA, JIB and JTL back Fabian Society call to invest in skills for a stronger built environment workforce.
Women's Contributions to the Built Environment.
Calls for the delayed Circular Economy Strategy
Over 50 leading businesses, trade associations and professional bodies, including CIAT, and UKGBC sign open letter.
The future workforce: culture change and skill
Under the spotlight at UK Construction Week London.
A landmark moment for postmodern heritage.
A safe energy transition – ECA launches a new Charter
Practical policy actions to speed up low carbon adoption while maintaining installation safety and competency.
Frank Duffy: Researcher and Practitioner
Reflections on achievements and relevance to the wider research and practice communities.
The 2026 Compliance Landscape: Fire doors
Why 'Business as Usual' is a Liability.
Cutting construction carbon footprint by caring for soil
Is construction neglecting one of the planet’s most powerful carbon stores and one of our greatest natural climate allies.